Discovering Camera Ergonomics Part 2 Framework and Concepts
 |
| This is my Mockup #13 with the lens removed so you can see how the fingers of the right hand lie in the natural 'half closed-relaxed' position when holding the handle. The shape of the handle and the location of all the control modules were dictated by the functional anatomy of the hands and fingers. This mockup is very comfortable to hold and the controls are all placed where the fingers want to find them so they would be very easy to operate. |
I propose a framework for describing, analysing and thinking about camera ergonomics as follows:
There are four Phases of camera use
1. Setup. At home, with the Instruction Manual to hand and no time pressure, go through the Menus and make desired settings.
2. Prepare. This refers to the few minutes just prior to a photo session when the camera must be configured for new subject matter. This might be landscape, portraiture, sport/action, long night exposure and so forth. Typically items requiring adjustment might include Main Capture Mode, Focus Mode, Autofocus Mode, Drive Mode, Quality, Stabiliser and numerous others.
3. Capture. In this Phase the user is making photos. Any adjustments must be made efficiently without interrupting the capture flow.
There are three ways in which the user interacts with the camera in Capture phase. These are
* Holding
Desirable characteristics are:
That the shape of the camera on the right side encourages the user to hold it using the ‘half closed, relaxed’ natural hand position. When thus held, the camera is firmly yet comfortably held without undue muscle effort. Key user interface modules (UIMs, buttons, dials, levers, switches) for controlling primary and secondary exposure and focus parameters are exactly where the right index finger and thumb want to find them without having to shift grip.
The shape of the left side of the camera and lens and/or lens barrel encourage a natural posture of the left hand and fingers without undue need for displacement at the wrist. Key tasks such as zoom and manual focus can be easily performed by feel while continuing to support the mass of the lens. (See more on this in Part 5)
* Viewing
Desirable characteristics are:
There is a clear, accurate preview of the subject via an eye level viewfinder and monitor. The same information is presented the same way in both for a seamless segue between them. Key camera data can be clearly displayed or not as user selected. (See more in Part 5)
* Operating
The two main considerations when operating the camera are
* Tasks
Typically items requiring adjustment in this Phase include primary and secondary exposure and focussing parameters.
Desirable characteristics are:
The user can adjust primary and secondary exposure and focussing parameters while looking continuously through the viewfinder and without having to change grip with either hand.
Primary exposure parameters are Aperture, Shutter Speed, Sensitivity (ISO).
Secondary exposure parameters are Exposure Compensation, White Balance.
Primary focus parameters are Initiate AF, Perform MF.
Secondary focus parameters are Change position and size of AF area, Switch AF/MF.
That does not mean every task on the list must be carried out for every exposure but the camera should be designed and configured so the user can efficiently carry out the tasks required for a particular exposure.
* Haptics
Desirable characteristics are:
That all UIMs for Capture Phase actions lie readily to hand when the camera is held comfortably in landscape or portrait orientation. UIMs for Capture Phase are easy to locate, distinguish from each other and operate by feel.
UIMs should not be located where they are prone to unintentional activation.
4. Review. In this Phase the user reviews photos already captured.
 |
| How not to do it. This is the original Sony A7 MILC. The upper yellow oval represents the index finger on the shutter button. The lower yellow oval is where the middle finger must be placed. the distance between them is about 50mm forcing an extreme displacement between the index and middle fingers. The persons responsible for this camera need to read my blog. The Mark 2 versions of the A7 have a projecting handle with the shutter button in the forward position. This is an improvement but still well short of ideal. |
Summary
Each Phase of use requires the user to carry out tasks.
Desirable characteristics for each task group can be listed in the form of a specification.
Completion of each task requires actions.
The number and complexityof actions can be observed and recorded. This is a type of motion study as pioneered by Frank and Lillian Gilbreth.
I do not directly observe the time taken to complete the various tasks. I take the view that economy of motion is the primary goal and that a device which can be operated with a small number of simple actions will be quicker to use than one which requires more and/or more complex actions.
The task specification and motion study information can be used to develop an ergonomic score for that camera.
Holding, Viewing and Haptics can also be evaluated and scored. I note that an individual user’s assessment of a camera’s holding, viewing and haptics contains both objective (observation) and subjective (experiential) elements.
Some people have difficulty with the idea that subjective experiences might be evaluated and scored but in fact this can be a valid and useful exercise if done with appropriate guidelines.
The essence of camera ergonomics
In one sentence, I propose that
Of two cameras, the one which can be operated with the fewest, least complex actions has the better ergonomics.
I also propose that ergonomics is not about:
* Individual likes and preferences. These are of course a valid part of the user experience but are separate from and complementary to the ergonomic analysis.
The problem with likes and preferences is that they are idiosyncratic (relevant to one individual only) transient (will change next week or month in response to the person’s experience) and often poorly formulated (‘I love/hate that camera but I can’t really say why’) .
Feedback from clinics, consumer surveys and focus groups has the same problems. It may well be useful for marketing purposes but does not helpfully inform the ergonomic design process.
An example: I have discovered that canting the handle back ten degrees is a really good idea. But this would be most unlikely to emerge from a focus group because people usually only talk about those things which are already within their experience.
* Head logic. Ergonomics is about finger logic. This issue arises most often when considering the merits of the ‘traditional’ control system versus the ‘modern’ system. The traditional system with aperture ring, shutter speed dial and exposure compensation dial is simple and logical.
One respondent to my posts said it is therefore “blindingly obvious” that the traditional system is the best.
But operation of a camera with the traditional system requires more actions most of them more complex than is required to operate a camera using a well designed modern system.
It occurs to me that some people might wonder if voice control could provide a more efficient way to operate a camera. I think this is highly unlikely. The problem is that the intention to adjust something has to be sent to the part of the brain which codes that idea into speech, then on to the part of the brain which transforms speech codes into nerve impulses, then on to the voice musculature. It is much faster to just do something like, say turn a dial to change the shutter speed. With practice muscle memory makes the process automatic.
Imagine driving a motor vehicle by voice control. ….’Turn left now’…..oops……not that far….. crash…….sorry…………
