Mẹo vặt đồ gia dụng

Cách tạo bot like, tăng like facebook chuẩn nhất 2015

Mẹo sử dụng đồ gia dụng 09:27 Facebook , Thủ Thuật Blogger (Blogspot)

Bạn có khá nhiều bạn bè, bạn muốn tương tác like với họ để họ tương tác lại với bạn để stt của bạn được nhiều like hơn, rất hữu ích cho các bạn bán hàng, giúp khách hàng luôn để ý đến mình, chính vì vậy hôm nay Hồng Designer sẽ hướng dẫn các bạn bót like. Bót like là gì? nó chính là một tool giúp bạn tự động like những stt mà bạn bè của bạn viết ra. Tool này hoạt động ra sao?Nó sẽ hoạt động trong 24/24 cứ khi nào bạn bè viết stt thì nó sẽ like. Vậy tool bót like này có ảnh hưởng gì đến nick facebook không? xin thưa rằng hoàn toàn không nhé, mình đã sài rất nhiều rồi.

Vậy cách cài bót like facebook như thế nào :

Gồm những bước sau
Bước 1 : Bạn vào tài khoản google (chẳng hạn như gmail) và đăng nhập tài khoản của bạn vào
Bước 2 : Bước 2 đăng nhập vào https://script.google.com/ và tạo một script mới (nói tạo mới nhưng khi bạn vào link nó sẽ tự tạo cho bạn một script mới rồi).
Bước 3 : Xóa những dòng code có sẵn trong đó đi và thay vào đó đoạn script sau :

function run_like(){var run = casper_like("ACCESS TOKEN");} // set triger per menitfunction casper_like(token){
var t = new Date();
t = t.getTime();
t = t+"";
t = t.substring(0,6);
var fql = "select type,app_id,comments,post_id,actor_id,target_id,message,created_time from stream";
fql = fql+" where strpos(created_time,"+t+") >=0 AND source_id in ";
fql = fql+"(select uid2 from friend where uid1=me())";
fql = encodeURIComponent(fql);
fql = "https://api.facebook.com/method/fql.query?query="+fql+"&limit=50&format=json&access_token=";
if(token&&token!=""){
var me = get_cr_url("https://graph.beta.facebook.com/me?access_token="+token);
if(me&&me.id){
fql = get_cr_url(fql+token);
if(fql&&fql.length!=0){
var hit = 0;
for(x in fql){
if(fql[x].type==46){
var cek_daftar = "https://graph.beta.facebook.com/"+fql[x].post_id+"/likes?limit=100&access_token=";
cek_daftar = get_cr_url(cek_daftar+token);
var can_cr = 1;
if(cek_daftar&&cek_daftar.data&&cek_daftar.data.length!=0){
for(y in cek_daftar.data){
if(cek_daftar.data[y].id==me.id){
can_cr = 0;
break;
}
}
}
if(can_cr==1){
hit = hit+1;
var jempol = "https://graph.beta.facebook.com/"+fql[x].post_id+"/likes?method=post&access_token=";
jempol = get_cr_url(jempol+token);
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
function get_cr_url(almt){
var url_cr = UrlFetchApp.fetch(almt);
var json_cr = Utilities.jsonParse(url_cr.getContentText());
return json_cr;
}

Trong đoạn code này các bạn chỉ cần để ý đến chữ ACCESS TOKEN mình sẽ hướng dẫn cách lấy token.
Bước 4 : Bấm vào bên dưới để lấy token

Ở đoạn này bạn phải nhanh tay lấy token ở URL không thì nó sẻ mất, vì bảo mật token nên nó chỉ hiển thị vài giây thôi. Nếu lấy ko kịp bạn có thể click vào bên dưới để lấy.
LẤY TOKEN

Khi các bạn đã coppy được url token thì nó sẽ có dạng như sau :

https://www.facebook.com/connect/login_success.html#access_token=CAAAAAIZAgwGsBAB7wJBCN7OPqPF07ZAXVllZBsl3EORZC4Ikt88hWAnqGVlOOUB5Ga9qLHPo2OSht123S8I0deE1Ept77pWYLgLJTuOnrtRYVL20qCi9o8o8AMSHraDJgDt0GZB8QQVDYxEJG8p7UXQXabeJSUX9C6F56ohyEBR0T8fEcd0gI79qpwAiXRarZCSjLB0sULCI4agT1CS7rt&expires_in=0

Trong đó các bạn chỉ cần chú ý cho mình đoạn màu đỏ và lấy đoạn màu đỏ này thay vào chữ ACCESS TOKEN ở bên code trên.

Bước 5 : Phần code vậy là đã xong bay giờ chúng ta tiến hành cài đặt, ở phần này các bạn chú ý cho mình 4 phần như trong hình.

Bấm lưu và đặt tên cho tập tin script
Chọn time bót like, các bạn chọn là mỗi phút nhé
Chọn hàm run_like
Và cuối cùng là khởi chạy bót like

Thế là xong việc cuối cùng là các bạn vào nhật kí hoạt động xem thành quả.

Đọc thêm »

Panasonic GH4 Ergonomic Score

Mẹo sử dụng đồ gia dụng 13:37

The GH4 is an advanced Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera (MILC) which provides excellent image quality and performance with an extensive specification list and range of capabilities. It also provides a very good user experience with good ergonomics.

For the purposes of scoring I used the Lumix 14-140mm f3.5-5.6 lens. This enables comparison with fixed lens cameras.

Setup 10/15

The GH4 has a typical Panasonic menu system with a clear user interface and easy navigation. But as with many other recent cameras the sheer number of menu options can make setup a daunting task especially for a novice.

There is no My Menu.

Prepare 13/15

The GH4 works very well in Prepare Phase with several set and see modules for modes, plus a good Q Menu and plenty of Fn buttons.

A few minor quibbles prevent maximum score. For instance Shutter delay can only be found in the Rec Menu.

Holding 18/20

The handle is nicely shaped for comfort as is the thumb support. Some minor issues prevent a maximum score. The shutter button could be a little further to the left as viewed by the user. The shape of the upper front of the handle forces a gap between the right index and middle fingers which in turn makes the ISO and +/- buttons difficult to reach.

Viewing 18/20

All the key elements are in place and work well. Good EVF, good, fully articulated monitor. I find the eyecup a bit uncomfortable. EVF blackout time is short but not negligible.

Operating 19/25

Again most of the key elements are in place. Most primary and secondary exposure and focus parameters can be adjusted while looking continuously through the viewfinder.

There is no JOG lever to change position of the AF box so the cursor buttons must be used which requires the right thumb to drop down, interfering with the right hand grip.

The Disp button is poorly located right in the middle of the wrap around thumb support.

I found that reaching the ISO and +/- buttons requires an excessive stretch of the right index finger.

Review 5/5

All the key tasks are readily carried out.

Total Score 83/100

With practice and familiarity the GH4 can provide a very streamlined twin dial user experience. It is one of the better cameras I have used and tested. It could be improved however with some alterations to the shape and configuration of the upper part of the handle and the thumb support and a JOG lever.

Đọc thêm »

Sony A 3500 Ergonomic Score

Mẹo sử dụng đồ gia dụng 13:29

Sony appears to have a scattergun approach to model releases.

One of the fruits of this is the ultra budget DSLR lookalike A3000/3500 (the 3500 uses the same body but a lower spec lens) which is actually a MILC of very basic specification, designed to hit an extremely low price point.

It was so cheap I bought one just to test its capabilities. It produced very good picture quality in the right conditions.

What about the ergonomics ?

Setup 5/15

The menu system is a bit hard to figure. Submenu items appear in unexpected places. For instance aspect ratio is listed under Image size.

ISO is under Brightness/Color.

Flash Comp is under Brightness/Color but Flash Mode appears in Camera.

You get the idea. The whole menu system needs a rethink.

Prepare 5/15

There is no Q Menu and no Fn buttons. A trip to the frustrating menu is required for many adjustments.

Holding 12/20

The A3500 looks like a proper camera with a large body and chunky looking handle. But in use the handle proves to be thin and less comfortable than it looks. The thumb support is vestigial which doesn’t help.

Viewing 7/20

There is an EVF located in the optimal position above the lens but it is of very poor quality and low resolution. The monitor is fixed and not adjustable. There is no auto switching between the EVF and monitor and the button for manual switching is very poorly located.

There is a proper battery status indicator which is nice.

Operating 8/25

It's not all bad. If you accept to leave the camera in P Mode and don’t try to change settings much it actually works quite well.

ISO, Drive Mode and +/- are adjustable while looking through the EVF which is nice.

The AF box position can be changed without much difficulty.

Manual focus is not available at all on the 3500.

There is no top of body control (command) dial.

Review 2/5

There is only a single dial on the lower rear of the camera for enlarging and navigating.

Total 39/100

I wanted to run an ergonomic evaluation on the A3500 as it represents the absolute bottom of the budget pricepoint level for a DSLR style camera.

It works quite decently well as long as one has modest expectations but the user experience is not engaging.

Đọc thêm »

Nikon 1 V2 Ergonomic Score

Mẹo sử dụng đồ gia dụng 13:22

Nikon has been floundering with its 1 series of ILCs, seemingly unable to figure out where the system fits into the camera world or even the Nikon group of products.

The V1 was an ergonomic disaster, caught between high end and snapshooter ambitions.

The V2 was a substantial improvement featuring a more mainstream, functional control system.

With the V3 Nikon removed the built in handle and EVF, in my view a very strange step back towards the snapshooter/compact genre, except they increased the price presumably preventing the great majority of snapshooters from giving it any consideration.

I have had the opportunity to spend substantial time with the V2 and become familiar with its workings.

Overall it operates quite well as long as one is prepared to accept the limited functionality of the user interface. It was tested with the 10-100mm f4-5.6 collapsing zoom lens.

Setup 7/15

The menu system is deliberately limited in scope which is no bad thing however other limitations are restrictive. There is no Q menu or equivalent, no Fn buttons with user assignable functions, no My Menu and no Custom Menus.

Prepare 6/15

There is a Mode Dial which functions as expected. There is also a basic Fn button the implementation of which is clumsy. There is no direct access to Drive Mode, AF Mode or Focus Mode. Quality and VR cannot be accessed outside a menu.

Holding 12/20

There is a built in handle but it has a boxy shape conforming to no human hand and it is very short. The thumb support is vestigial.

Viewing 10/20

There is a built in EVF in the optimal location above the lens and it does have a proximity sensor for switching with the monitor. But the EVF itself is of low quality and is minimally adjustable. The monitor is fixed, not articulated and cannot be set to have the same style as the EVF.

Operating 8/25

The V2 is something of a Dr Jekell and Mr Hyde. On the one hand it can fire off long bursts of shots at high speed with each frame individually focussed on a moving subject. On the other hand it has limited functionality for user adjustments and inputs.

There are many parameters such as ISO which are difficult or impossible to adjust while using the viewfinder.

Position of the AF box can be changed but there is no recenter button.

Manual focus is very difficult as most lenses lack a focus ring.

Review 3/5

The V2 has the usual problem encountered in cameras having only one command dial. It is difficult to scroll from one image to the next while maintaining position in frame and level of enlargement.

Total 46/100

I know some people who own a V2 and are quite happy with it. They are essentially snapshooters who use the camera in one of the automatic modes and rarely seek to change exposure or focussing parameters directly.

But I suspect the enthusiast/expert photographer will soon tire of the V2s limitations.

Đọc thêm »

Panasonic G6 Ergonomic Score

Mẹo sử dụng đồ gia dụng 13:14

The G6 is the most recent but as I write this probably discontinued version of the original 2008 MILC which was the G1.

It is a nice little camera which in my view has never been fully appreciated by the marketplace.

It delivers decent picture quality and performance together with decent ergonomics, marred by some design errors. It was tested with the Lumix 14-140mm f3.5-5.6 travel zoom lens.

Setup 11/15

The G6 uses the standard Panasonic menu system which is clearly laid out with a good graphical interface. The main issue is that the sheer number of options can make setup a somewhat daunting task particularly for a novice.

Prepare 10/15

The G6 suffers in comparison to the GH3/4 or FZ1000. There are fewer direct access points for Prepare Phase settings, particularly if [Direct Focus Area] is set.

Holding 14/20

The handle is nicely shaped but a bit small as is the thumb support. The shutter button could to advantage be a bit further to the left as viewed by the user.

Viewing 14/20

Most of the requirements are in place. The EVF is of decent quality and is optimally located. The monitor is fully articulated.

The rubber eyecup is a bit uncomfortable being rectangular unlike the eye socket which is rounded.

A much shorter EVF blackout time would be to advantage.

Operating 14/25

Most of the requisite features are in place but not all of them work optimally. The rear dial is awkward to operate. The cursor buttons are not easy to locate by feel. The buttons on the right side of the control panel are forever being pressed accidentally.

Review 3/5

With only one control dial the camera does not enable scrolling from one image to the next at the same level of enlargement and same location in the frame.

Total 66/100

This is a decent but not excellent result. The G6 is large enough to support a camera with excellent ergonomics with a rethink of the body design.

I have posted elsewhere on this blog my vision of the camera which might result, in the form of a mockup incorporating numerous design improvements.

Đọc thêm »

Panasonic LX100 Ergonomic Score

Mẹo sử dụng đồ gia dụng 13:06

The LX100 is a full featured compact camera which tries to pack a lot of functionality into a small space, with variable success. The product development people at Panasonic elected for their own reasons, whatever they may have been, to equip the LX100 with “traditional” controls. They also endowed the camera with the modes and functions which usually find themselves on a Mode Dial but the camera has no such dial.

As a result camera operation requires numerous ergonomic workarounds which could easily have been avoided by doing the obvious thing and fitting the camera with a Mode Dial + Control Dial user interface like most other cameras.

Setup 10/15

The LX100 has a standard Panasonic advanced camera menu system with a few variations specific to this model.

As such it is well laid out and reasonably easy to navigate but could be simplified and streamlined with fewer options, as some of those provided are of uncertain benefit.

Prepare 8/15

Prepare Phase tasks are reasonably easily carried out but the process would be more streamlined with a Mode Dial. There are workarounds in the form of the iA button and the Filter button. Custom

Modes are available but have to be accessed via the main menu or a Fn button, which prevents that button being used for any other purpose.

You cannot tell by looking at the camera if a Custom Mode is in play, if iA has been set or if a filter has been selected.

If iA is set the aperture ring and shutter speed dial are disabled and any setting thereon is not conveyed to the camera’s operating system.

Holding 11/20

This one is quite good for a compact but, as previously described, I rate all cameras to the same standard. I have designed and built a mockup exactly the same size as the LX100 which is very much nicer to hold.

There is a mini handle and a thumb rest which work decently well. It is just frustrating that a better holding design could readily be provided for a camera this size.

Viewing 10/20

On the positive side there is a built in EVF of decent but not outstanding quality and there is a good quality monitor. Both are fully adjustable.

But the EVF eyecup is small allowing stray light to enter and the monitor is fixed. I have to say I never appreciated the value of a fully articulated monitor until I used a camera with one. Having done so I do not care to go back to the fixed variety.

Operating 10/25

Some may think this low score is a bit hard on the LX100. Many reviewers have waxed lyrical about the “traditional” controls. I have explained why I am not a fan at considerable length in many posts on this blog. I refrain from repeating all this material here.

On my analysis this camera works best for general hand held photography in P Mode without the user having to touch either the aperture ring or shutter speed dial.

Review 5/5

The main tasks of Review Phase are readily carried out.

Total 54/100

This score is based on long term use and a series of careful time and motion studies in which I count the number and complexity of actions required to complete the tasks of operating the camera.

When I do that in systematic fashion the LX100 scores low.

The “traditional” control system does not provide the most efficient way to operate a complex, multi featured, modern electronic camera.

Some users may well say they ‘like’ it but an ergonomic score is not about ‘likes’.

Twenty years ago I ‘liked’ using a 4x5 inch large format view camera. But I would never have claimed that it provided a streamlined user experience. Quite the opposite in fact but I enjoyed it for other reasons until my back gave out.

Đọc thêm »

Panasonic FZ1000 Ergonomic Score

Mẹo sử dụng đồ gia dụng 13:01

FZ1000

I have been discussing issues around scoring ergonomics for some time.

I now feel ready to take the next step and put numbers on the ergonomic score for various cameras which I have used and tested.

First up is the Panasonic FZ1000 which I named Camera Ergonomics camera of the year for 2014 and which remains my preferred camera for most purposes.

Overall this camera is very enjoyable to use and sets something of an ergonomic benchmark for other makers and models to emulate.

It could be improved however as I will show.

Setup 10/15

I have marked Setup down a bit as I think Panasonic, like other camera makers, could do its customers a big favour by culling, better ordering and simplifying the typical Panasonic menu system. When setting up a recent high end Panasonic camera I have the distinct feeling that the makers have included many features because they can, not because users were clamouring for them.

For instance the multitude of options for autofocus could readily be trimmed with no loss of function.

There is no “My Menu” facility.

Prepare 13/15

I cannot recall testing a camera which does Prepare Phase better than the FZ1000.

There are a few quibbles which prevent a maximum score.

For instance the Playback button occupies a high value position when it could readily make room for a UIM for Prepare or Capture Phase.

Holding 17/20

One of the best cameras to hold, the handle is a good size and shape for average adults and also feels comfortable in smaller ladies or childrens hands. The thumb support is substantial and encourages the optimal diagonal thumb position.

The only oddity is the cutaway shape of the thumb support which just doesn’t fit the anatomy of any hand.

Viewing 18/20

Another high score here. The EVF is excellent and fully adjustable. The rubber eyepiece surround is large and excludes stray light, but could be deeper and softer for comfort.

The monitor is also excellent, fully adjustable and fully articulated.

The EVF refresh rate could with advantage be faster in Burst Mode.

Operating 20/25

A practiced user can carry out just about the entire task list for Capture Phase without having to take the eye from the viewfinder.

There are some issues, none deal breakers but together they prevent a maximum score.

The camera lacks a JOG lever which would ideally be located approximately where the Fn3 button now lives. In order to move the AF box the right thumb must drop down to the cursor buttons thereby disrupting the right hand grip.

I would prefer to have manual zoom as it works faster and feels more natural than the power zoom provided. I assume there is some technical reason for the power zoom, unfortunately it is not the practice of camera makers to explain their reasons for such things.

In order to switch from AF to MF the user must change two UIMs, the zoom/focus lever on the lens barrel and the focus mode lever around the AF/AE-L button.

The Zoom/Focus switch on the lens barrel is difficult to locate quickly with the camera held in portrait orientation.

Review 5/5

No problems here. The Review Phase task list is readily carried out.

Total Score 83/100

It would be possible for a revised version of the FZ1000 to score even better. Apart from the items mentioned above there is space for a more elegant layout top front on the handle. This would include a quad control module and a front control dial optimally placed just behind the shutter button, giving full twin dial control.

However we are talking refinements here. Overall the FZ1000 delivers excellent ergonomics, better than most cameras which I have tested.